To prepare a journal article for submission, choose a journal that fits your work, follow its author guidelines exactly and assemble every required file and declaration before you upload. Many papers are rejected at the editor's desk for avoidable reasons.
This guide is for graduate students and early-career researchers turning a thesis chapter, DNP project or study into a manuscript. It covers journal choice, formatting, files, the cover letter, ethics and authorship, the online system and what to expect after submission.
The Submission Package in Brief
- A manuscript formatted to the journal's guidelines, within its word limit.
- A title page, kept separate if the journal uses anonymized review.
- Figures and tables in the required format and resolution.
- A cover letter addressed to the editor.
- Declarations on ethics, funding, conflicts of interest, data and authorship.
- Any completed reporting checklist, such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA or SQUIRE.
Choosing the Right Journal
Fit matters more than prestige. A strong paper sent to the wrong journal is often returned within days without review.
- Read the aims and scope, and recent issues, to check your topic and design fit.
- Look at article types and word limits; a practice project may suit a brief report or quality improvement section.
- Consider the audience: clinicians, researchers, educators or policymakers.
- Check open access options and any article processing charges.
- Note typical review times if your timeline matters.
Be wary of journals that solicit by email, promise very fast acceptance or are vague about peer review and fees. Checking whether a journal is indexed in the databases you use, listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals where it is open access, and a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics helps you avoid predatory publishers.
Turning a Thesis or Project into an Article
A thesis chapter is not an article. Journals want a single clear contribution in far fewer words, so most of the work is cutting and refocusing.
| Thesis or project report | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Long literature review | A few paragraphs establishing the gap |
| Detailed methods with justification of every choice | Concise methods, with detail in supplementary files if allowed |
| Every result reported | Results that answer the article's question |
| Program-specific sections, such as competency mapping | Removed |
| University formatting | Journal formatting and reference style |
Check whether your thesis is publicly available in a repository; most journals accept articles derived from theses, but some ask you to disclose it.
Following the Author Guidelines
Every journal publishes instructions for authors. Read them in full and make a checklist; editors notice quickly when they have been ignored.
- Article type, word limit and what counts towards it.
- Abstract format and length, and number of keywords.
- Heading structure and section order.
- Reference style, such as APA 7th, Vancouver or the journal's own.
- Limits on tables, figures and references.
- Line numbering, spacing and file type.
- Rules for anonymizing the manuscript for blind review.
Title, Abstract and Keywords
Editors and reviewers decide quickly, often from the title and abstract alone, whether a paper is worth their time. Give these elements more care than their length suggests.
- Make the title specific: name the topic, population and, where useful, the design.
- Avoid questions, puns and undefined abbreviations in the title unless the journal's style encourages them.
- Write the abstract last, in the journal's exact format, with your main figures.
- Choose keywords that add search terms not already in the title, using controlled vocabulary such as MeSH where relevant.
Check that every number in the abstract matches the results section and tables. Inconsistencies here are among the first things a reviewer notices.
Reporting Guidelines
Many health and science journals require a reporting guideline checklist, with page numbers showing where each item appears. Using it while writing, not after, saves rework.
| Study type | Guideline |
|---|---|
| Randomized trial | CONSORT |
| Observational study | STROBE |
| Systematic review | PRISMA 2020 |
| Qualitative study | COREQ or SRQR |
| Quality improvement | SQUIRE 2.0 |
| Case report | CARE |
The EQUATOR Network maintains a library of reporting guidelines if your design is not listed here.
Ethics, Authorship and Declarations
Submission systems ask for several statements. Prepare them in advance so the upload is not delayed.
- Ethics: name the approving body and reference number, or state the basis for exemption or a quality improvement determination, and how consent was handled.
- Authorship: many journals follow ICMJE criteria, which require substantial contribution to the work, drafting or critical revision, approval of the final version and accountability for the work. Others who helped go in the acknowledgments.
- Contributions: some journals ask for a contributor statement, often using the CRediT roles.
- Conflicts of interest and funding: declare all relevant interests and sources of support.
- Data availability: state whether and how data can be accessed.
- Use of AI tools: follow the journal's policy on disclosure.
Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at a time is not permitted. Most journals also expect each author to have an ORCID identifier.
Writing the Cover Letter
A cover letter is short, usually a page or less. It tells the editor what you found, why it matters to their readers and confirms the required statements.
Dear Dr Walsh,
Please consider our manuscript, "Structured napping and fatigue among night-shift nurses: a pre-post quality improvement study", for publication as an original article in [Journal name].
Night-shift fatigue is a recognized safety concern, yet few interventions have been evaluated in acute hospitals. In this study on two medical units, a structured napping program was associated with lower fatigue scores over eight weeks. We believe the findings will interest your readers in nurse leadership and patient safety.
The manuscript is original, has not been published and is not under consideration elsewhere. All authors approved the submission and meet the journal's authorship criteria. The project received a quality improvement determination from the hospital's review board. We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Yours sincerely,
Amara Osei, on behalf of the authors
The study and names are illustrative. Keep the letter specific to the journal; a generic letter suggests the paper was sent to many journals in turn.
Using the Submission System
- Create an account and link your ORCID.
- Enter author names, affiliations and the corresponding author.
- Paste the title, abstract and keywords, checking for formatting errors.
- Upload files in the order and format requested.
- Complete declarations and any checklist questions.
- Suggest or exclude reviewers if invited, with genuine reasons.
- Review the generated proof PDF carefully before approving.
What Happens After Submission
| Decision | What it means | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Desk rejection | Editor declined without review, often for fit or scope | Revise for a better-fitting journal and resubmit there |
| Major revision | Substantial changes needed before reconsideration | Respond to every comment in a point-by-point letter |
| Minor revision | Small changes requested | Revise promptly and explain each change |
| Rejection after review | Not accepted, with reviewer feedback | Use the comments to strengthen the paper for another journal |
| Acceptance | Moves to production | Check proofs carefully and sign the publishing agreement |
Review times vary widely between journals. Our guide on responding to peer reviewers explains how to write a response letter that addresses every comment.
Common Submission Mistakes
- Sending a thesis chapter almost unchanged.
- Ignoring the word limit or reference style.
- Leaving author names in an anonymized manuscript or file properties.
- Missing ethics, funding or conflict statements.
- Figures at too low a resolution or in the wrong format.
- An abstract that does not match the results.
- Choosing a journal from an unsolicited email without checking it.
How IvyDrafts Helps Prepare Journal Submissions
Send your manuscript, the target journal, its author guidelines and any co-author comments. A graduate manuscript editor checks structure, word count, references, reporting items and anonymization against the guidelines, edits for clarity, and drafts a custom cover letter for you to adapt.
We never add data, results or authors, and we do not submit on your behalf. Free revisions within the scope of your original request are included, and your identity is never shared with the editor.
Submit a Manuscript the Editor Can Send to Review
Send your manuscript, the target journal and its author guidelines. Your editor returns a checked, formatted manuscript and a custom cover letter draft.
Order Manuscript PreparationFree revisions · Full refund if late · Written from scratch for your order
Frequently Asked Questions
Match your topic, design and audience to the journal's aims and scope, then check article types, word limits, open access costs and indexing.
Usually yes, after substantial revision to a shorter, focused article that follows the journal's guidelines. Some journals ask you to disclose the thesis.
The title and article type, the main finding and why it suits the journal, and confirmation that the work is original, not under review elsewhere and approved by all authors.
Many journals use ICMJE criteria: substantial contribution, drafting or revising, final approval and accountability. Others are acknowledged.
No. Simultaneous submission is not allowed. Wait for a decision or withdraw before submitting elsewhere.
A decision by the editor not to send the paper for review, often because of scope, fit or presentation.
Many health and science journals require one, such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, COREQ or SQUIRE, depending on design.
It varies widely by journal and field, from several weeks to several months.